<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mad Scientist Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madscientistjournal.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madscientistjournal.org</link>
	<description>The Academic Journal for the Misunderstood Genius</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 18:22:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Women of Mad Science by Kate Estabrooks (aka K. Esta)</title>
		<link>http://madscientistjournal.org/2013/04/women-of-mad-science/#comment-72858</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Estabrooks (aka K. Esta)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 18:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madscientistjournal.org/?p=895#comment-72858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an interesting topic. I&#039;ll admit that I chose to write under the name K. Esta for a few reasons, the main one being: My full last name, Estabrooks, though only three syllables and spelled phonetically, seems to baffle people. I wanted something easy to remember and type into Google—assuming someone might someday care enough to do so. 

The benefit of gender neutrality, however, was not lost on me and was the main motivation behind K rather than Kate. My favorite genre is Sci-Fi and I have a strong science and engineering background from both my education and previous work. Even so, I was afraid that my writing wouldn&#039;t be considered as seriously if the reader knew up front that I was a woman. Was my concern justified? I’ll admit, I was also curious to see what assumptions people would make if they didn&#039;t know my gender. 

As it turns out, even though there is more than one post on my blog that should lead someone paying attention to the conclusion that I&#039;m likely a woman (like reference to ‘my husband’, so either I&#039;m a woman or a gay man)—and at no time have I ever deliberately written something to imply that I&#039;m a man—there have been multiple comments, on my blog and elsewhere, where the readers&#039; assumptions are clear. For example, I&#039;ve been referred to as &#039;old chap&#039;, and in one review of my serial novel, Dosterra, any reference to &#039;the author&#039; was accompanied by the personal pronouns &#039;he&#039; and &#039;him&#039;.

I certainly agree with the above comment that children, male or female, will make a lot of assumptions about their abilities based on the feedback they get from their parents (and society as a whole) and those assumptions will stick with them for their entire lives. How many girls didn&#039;t take an interest in science (science fiction, monsters, insects or other &#039;gross&#039; things) because they were Daddy’s little princess, and how may boys didn&#039;t take cooking or dance lessons because they were Mommy&#039;s tough little man??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting topic. I&#8217;ll admit that I chose to write under the name K. Esta for a few reasons, the main one being: My full last name, Estabrooks, though only three syllables and spelled phonetically, seems to baffle people. I wanted something easy to remember and type into Google—assuming someone might someday care enough to do so. </p>
<p>The benefit of gender neutrality, however, was not lost on me and was the main motivation behind K rather than Kate. My favorite genre is Sci-Fi and I have a strong science and engineering background from both my education and previous work. Even so, I was afraid that my writing wouldn&#8217;t be considered as seriously if the reader knew up front that I was a woman. Was my concern justified? I’ll admit, I was also curious to see what assumptions people would make if they didn&#8217;t know my gender. </p>
<p>As it turns out, even though there is more than one post on my blog that should lead someone paying attention to the conclusion that I&#8217;m likely a woman (like reference to ‘my husband’, so either I&#8217;m a woman or a gay man)—and at no time have I ever deliberately written something to imply that I&#8217;m a man—there have been multiple comments, on my blog and elsewhere, where the readers&#8217; assumptions are clear. For example, I&#8217;ve been referred to as &#8216;old chap&#8217;, and in one review of my serial novel, Dosterra, any reference to &#8216;the author&#8217; was accompanied by the personal pronouns &#8216;he&#8217; and &#8216;him&#8217;.</p>
<p>I certainly agree with the above comment that children, male or female, will make a lot of assumptions about their abilities based on the feedback they get from their parents (and society as a whole) and those assumptions will stick with them for their entire lives. How many girls didn&#8217;t take an interest in science (science fiction, monsters, insects or other &#8216;gross&#8217; things) because they were Daddy’s little princess, and how may boys didn&#8217;t take cooking or dance lessons because they were Mommy&#8217;s tough little man??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oenophilia by Megan Vogel</title>
		<link>http://madscientistjournal.org/2013/05/oenophilia/#comment-72076</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan Vogel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 00:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madscientistjournal.org/?p=677#comment-72076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lol!  Actually, it could have been a Cabernet Franc... dun dun dunnnnnn!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol!  Actually, it could have been a Cabernet Franc&#8230; dun dun dunnnnnn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oenophilia by Cindy</title>
		<link>http://madscientistjournal.org/2013/05/oenophilia/#comment-72073</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 23:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madscientistjournal.org/?p=677#comment-72073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really, Meggie?  Just a Cabernet? Not a Cabernet Savignon.  I&#039;m afraid Dr. W may not have told you the whole story.

Great job. Now go back to marketing. Nothing to see here...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, Meggie?  Just a Cabernet? Not a Cabernet Savignon.  I&#8217;m afraid Dr. W may not have told you the whole story.</p>
<p>Great job. Now go back to marketing. Nothing to see here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Women of Mad Science by Diana Parparita</title>
		<link>http://madscientistjournal.org/2013/04/women-of-mad-science/#comment-71407</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Parparita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madscientistjournal.org/?p=895#comment-71407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In regards to sci-fi, I think the problem is that it requires some form of science, and I&#039;ve heard many girls were discouraged from learning science or from thinking that science was something they could learn easily. As an only child, I&#039;ve always been a substitute for a son to my parents, so when I was little I was &quot;Daddy&#039;s little physicist&quot; and &quot;Daddy&#039;s little chemist&quot; and it was implied that science should be easy for me to learn and understand. But my father was quite a misogynist and kept saying that women couldn&#039;t drive and so, even though he kept saying that didn&#039;t apply to me, just to other women, I still don&#039;t have a driver&#039;s licence, nor did I ever try to take a driving test. And that&#039;s really the important part: he said I couldn&#039;t do it so I never &lt;i&gt;tried&lt;/i&gt;.

My advice for getting more women to write sci-fi is to tell little girls that there&#039;s nothing more feminine, more appropriate for a young lady to learn, than science. And, of course, to show them that it&#039;s easy and fun to learn. Keep at this pro-science campaign for about 10 years and 10 to 20 years from now we&#039;ll have a new generation of women scientists and sci-fi writers. Then they will find a way to genetically engineer men to wash their own socks and cook their own lunches and especially to take their wives out on a proper date every week even 50 years after they got married. And yes, with all that extra spare time from having to do less washing and less cooking, they&#039;ll be writing and submitting a lot more stories than men.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to sci-fi, I think the problem is that it requires some form of science, and I&#8217;ve heard many girls were discouraged from learning science or from thinking that science was something they could learn easily. As an only child, I&#8217;ve always been a substitute for a son to my parents, so when I was little I was &#8220;Daddy&#8217;s little physicist&#8221; and &#8220;Daddy&#8217;s little chemist&#8221; and it was implied that science should be easy for me to learn and understand. But my father was quite a misogynist and kept saying that women couldn&#8217;t drive and so, even though he kept saying that didn&#8217;t apply to me, just to other women, I still don&#8217;t have a driver&#8217;s licence, nor did I ever try to take a driving test. And that&#8217;s really the important part: he said I couldn&#8217;t do it so I never <i>tried</i>.</p>
<p>My advice for getting more women to write sci-fi is to tell little girls that there&#8217;s nothing more feminine, more appropriate for a young lady to learn, than science. And, of course, to show them that it&#8217;s easy and fun to learn. Keep at this pro-science campaign for about 10 years and 10 to 20 years from now we&#8217;ll have a new generation of women scientists and sci-fi writers. Then they will find a way to genetically engineer men to wash their own socks and cook their own lunches and especially to take their wives out on a proper date every week even 50 years after they got married. And yes, with all that extra spare time from having to do less washing and less cooking, they&#8217;ll be writing and submitting a lot more stories than men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Women of Mad Science by Torrey</title>
		<link>http://madscientistjournal.org/2013/04/women-of-mad-science/#comment-71402</link>
		<dc:creator>Torrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madscientistjournal.org/?p=895#comment-71402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m pretty sure you have to be cackling madly &amp; rubbing your hands together with evil intent when you say, 

&quot;How do we get more women to submit?&quot;

(also, thanks for the peek inside the numbers! Fascinating.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure you have to be cackling madly &amp; rubbing your hands together with evil intent when you say, </p>
<p>&#8220;How do we get more women to submit?&#8221;</p>
<p>(also, thanks for the peek inside the numbers! Fascinating.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Submissions by Online Publishing &#8211; A Lesson in Patience: Part One &#171; Writing by K. Esta</title>
		<link>http://madscientistjournal.org/submissions/#comment-68230</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Publishing &#8211; A Lesson in Patience: Part One &#171; Writing by K. Esta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madscientistjournal.org/?page_id=11#comment-68230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and mad science don&#8217;t sound like your thing they still might be worth a look. Check out their submission guidelines. They use Submittable, a submission manager that allows authors to see/track their [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and mad science don&#8217;t sound like your thing they still might be worth a look. Check out their submission guidelines. They use Submittable, a submission manager that allows authors to see/track their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Submissions by Submissions &#8211; A Lesson in Patience Part One &#171; Writing by K. Esta</title>
		<link>http://madscientistjournal.org/submissions/#comment-68169</link>
		<dc:creator>Submissions &#8211; A Lesson in Patience Part One &#171; Writing by K. Esta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madscientistjournal.org/?page_id=11#comment-68169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and mad science don&#8217;t sound like your thing they still might be worth a look. Check out their submission guidelines. They use Submittable, a submission manager that allows authors to see/track their [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and mad science don&#8217;t sound like your thing they still might be worth a look. Check out their submission guidelines. They use Submittable, a submission manager that allows authors to see/track their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Writings of Brigham Worthing by Rachel</title>
		<link>http://madscientistjournal.org/2013/03/the-writings-of-brigham-worthing/#comment-61742</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madscientistjournal.org/?p=701#comment-61742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Loved the story!  I think I loved it all the more for having just read Dracula, also an epistolary novel, and Frankenstein.  A fun read, and a very original premise:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved the story!  I think I loved it all the more for having just read Dracula, also an epistolary novel, and Frankenstein.  A fun read, and a very original premise:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Writings of Brigham Worthing by Samantha Memi</title>
		<link>http://madscientistjournal.org/2013/03/the-writings-of-brigham-worthing/#comment-61706</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha Memi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madscientistjournal.org/?p=701#comment-61706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great story Alexis. loved the format. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great story Alexis. loved the format. <img src='http://madscientistjournal.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on That Man Behind the Curtain: January 2013 by Mad Scientist Journal</title>
		<link>http://madscientistjournal.org/2013/02/that-man-behind-the-curtain-january-2013/#comment-49314</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Scientist Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madscientistjournal.org/?p=723#comment-49314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a long list of problems that currently prevent me from having MSJ on Amazon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a long list of problems that currently prevent me from having MSJ on Amazon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
